Iridient developer vs lightroom fuji11/15/2022 If you’re a serious Fuji X shooter then I wouldn’t pass this one up. And if you’re a JPEG only shooter, this is a good reason to maybe consider shooting RAW on some of your more important photos.After traditional “spring clean-up” of my collection (read: sell, sell, sell) I got some cash to acquire new toys. The resolution and detail you’re able to obtain is definitely worth the hassle of adding an extra step to your workflow. In this comparison we can see that Iridient brings our Fuji RAW files into a whole new class of image quality. Hopefully there are some improvements to Lightroom’s RAW converter since it is falling behind, but I guess we would have seen that with the latest Adobe Camera Raw update. I was actually waiting for the new version of Lightroom to come out before doing this test but all signs of it just seemed to vanish from existence. The difference of sharpness is marginal, but the Iridient sample seems to have this extra crispness that’s slightly more pleasant. Just out of curiosity I did a test with the standard Bayer sensor of the Sony A7r. Iridient vs Lightroom – Standard Bayer Sensor The noise is slightly more chunky with Iridient, but the detail and color is also very good. It seems Lightroom sort of just blurs everything causing a loss in detail. The two different programs take a completely different approach to noise reduction. With Iridient there are also a few different noise reduction techniques. #Iridient developer vs lightroom fuji isoMy guess is this is a characteristic of the X-Trans pixel array and Iridient just accentuates it.įor the noise reduction I shot three stops underexposed at ISO 3200, then push the exposure to correct. With Lightroom you can see some patterns on Black, Red, Magenta and Blue. It only happens on Red, Magenta, 3/Color and Blue. We do get some strange color patterns on some of the color swatches. We can see significantly sharper details, but also richer colors. (Or those little squigglies that tend to appear.) My goal with this test was to push the sharpness as far as I could while creating minimal artifacts. To simplify things I’ve chosen Iridient Reveal since it is the default. Lightroom uses some form of Unsharp Mask while Iridient has six different sharpening options all with varying results. The sharpness comparison is tricky since the settings are not the same. Iridient vs Lightroom Sharpness Comparison The Lightroom sample does actually look a little nicer, but the image still seems a bit more smeary. So I did a test where I tried to match contrast to see if there was still a difference. Extra contrast naturally will make some detail more apparent as well cause the colors to pop. And that’s looking at it with Internet Jpeg compression.īaseline Sharpness With Lightroom Contrastīy default Iridient is adding some extra contrast to the images. With no settings Iridient is already significantly more crisp, with much more detail. This comparison shows the difference with color rendering and base sharpness. Image was shot ISO 200, f5.6 on the Fuji X-T1 with the 56mm f1.2 lens. With the baseline comparison I turned all the settings completely off. Iridient vs Lightroom Baseline Comparison It’s also really nice at decoding standard Bayer sensors, which I cover a little at the end of this comparison. Because of this, we see a lot more detail and color accuracy when processing our RAF files. If you’re a Fuji X shooter, Iridient uses a unique algorithm designed specifically for the Fuji X-Trans sensor. #Iridient developer vs lightroom fuji softwareThe idea is to use it to convert your raw files into PSDs or TIFFs before editing them in a photo editing software like Lightroom or Photoshop. My goal here is to just focus on detail, color rendition and noise reduction.Īnd while Iridient is a little clunky and comes with almost no documentation, that’s ok, it’s not really designed to be a one-stop-shop photo editing program. When it comes to features Lightroom is still years ahead of Iridient. Iridient vs Lightroom A Detailed Comparisonįor this test I’m not going to compare features. I’ve been using Iridient for the last few months with my Fuji X100T and have been so blown away by the difference it makes when converting my Fuji RAW files, that I decided to do a detailed comparison between Iridient and Lightroom to show you just how much better it can be at processing Fuji X-Trans files.Īnd the results turned out a lot better than I was expecting. If you haven’t, it’s definitely something worth checking out. If you’re a Fuji shooter you may have heard of this RAW converter called Iridient Developer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |